-
- Comment No objection stated to merging. @Zoupan: or other interested editor should consider proceeding with a Bold merger. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 15:45, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
- Done by interested party. Richard3120 (talk) 02:21, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
-
*:WikiProject Military history has been notified to help generate additional attention to the above request(s). Thanks, GenQuest "Talk to Me" 17:52, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
- Done by interested party. Richard3120 (talk) 02:21, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
- Myoui Mina should be merged into Twice. Myoui is not notable on her own and the discussion in the talk page seems limited to just me and two users who appear to have created accounts solely to work on this page. Articles are tagged but discussion needs input from more experienced contributors. >>>Discussion Here<<< Katzenlibrary (talk) 23:51, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
- Articles are tagged and awaiting discussion result. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 12:31, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- Working. Result of discussion is to follow through with the merge. Archiving request and transcluding discussion to target talk page (Twice). GenQuest "Talk to Me" 20:56, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
- {Transfer from request made at project talkpage GenQuest "Talk to Me" 17:41, 11 January 2016 (UTC)}
- Articles are tagged and awaiting completion of consensus discussion. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 07:47, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
-
- Comment No objection stated to merging. @Gudzwabofer: or other interested editor should consider proceeding with a Bold merger. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 16:17, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- I would propose a rapid merger of Unique visitor
and into Unique user, as the larger, more detailed of the two (Uu) states repeatedly that the two are synonymous, and the smaller of the two articles (Uv) is very short and based on a single source. Transfer of the content should be fast and simple, with addition of a sentence that Uu is (it appears) more often used my the coding communities, and Uv by business/marketing individuals. >>>Discussion Here<<<. Cheers. Le Prof User:Leprof_7272 Leprof 7272 (talk) 16:17, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- {Transfer from request made at project talkpage GenQuest "Talk to Me" 17:41, 11 January 2016 (UTC)}
- Articles are tagged and awaiting merge discussion consensus. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 07:47, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
- Working Only comments support the merge request. @Leprof 7272: or other interested editor should proceed with the merge. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 18:35, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Comment: Unclear request, but no opposition stated. @Subzzee: should be bold and follow through with merging. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 17:25, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
- Article(s) are tagged and awaiting consensus discussion. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 14:31, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
- I am preparing to carry out the long-proposed merge between Snack and Snack food, and would welcome any comments or recommendations. Cheers! bd2412 T 03:01, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- @BD2412: Just at a glance, it looks like it would be relatively simple. The sections in snack would fit nicely almost exactly as is into the snack food. You wouldn't even need to integrate anything into the existing sections, there aren't many subsections in the snack food article. --NickPenguin(contribs) 03:46, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Done. Cheers! bd2412 T 04:55, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Articles are tagged and awaiting consensus on proposal. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 23:35, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: with the use of sortable lists, there should be little opposition to this proposal, due to duplication of content. Proposer, or someone interested, should feel free to boldly merge. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 23:35, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
- Working @Verbcatcher: has specific ideas regarding the proposal and should follow through with alternative plan, which has no opposition stated. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 16:59, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
-
-
- Working Articles could survive Bold merge. @RekishiEJ: should consider doing the merge, or withdrawing the request. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 16:52, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
- Merge List of military occupations into List of territorial disputes. >>>Discussion<<<. The lists are fundamentally the same, but the first is essentially a platform for editors with strong points of view about particular conflicts to cast one or another side of a conflict in a negative light. See the talk page for typical discussions among partisan editors. The merge is likely to be contested by these partisan editors, as "List of territorial disputes" is a much more neutral (and more accurate) description of the conflicts listed. --Ravpapa (talk) 17:10, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Current discussion leans to not merge these two articles. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 23:35, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
-
- Not done Overwhelming consensus to NOT do a merge. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 16:30, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
-
-
- Not done Consensus is that the merge should NOT occur. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 16:17, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Only comment so far supports merging. Nominator or someone knowledgeable about subject should proceed with the merge. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 17:15, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
-
-
- Working Consensus is to merge. @John123521: or other interested editor should go ahead with the merging procedure. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 14:59, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
- Articles are tagged and awaiting consensus discussion. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 23:58, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
-
- Working Consensus is to merge. @Delibzr: or other editor should proceed with request. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 16:39, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
-
-
Malchow concentration camp Discussion
|
- Oppose. Look again, better yet, withdraw this nomination due to possible error in judgement. Thanks, Poeticbent talk 07:19, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
- Support. Strongly disagree with Poeticbent and thank you not to include POV in talk. Subcamps are not historically notable for their names, because they were not given names. See [[3]]. Very simple to observe that subcamps were redirected to the geographical areas where they were located, because the subcamps did not have proper names. Treatment of Malchow concentration camp nonstandard and nonperformant. Stan94301 (talk) 16:09, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
- Moved discussion to Ravensbrück talk page; tagged articles and created discussion area for further debate. Awaiting consensusGenQuest "Talk to Me" 10:02, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
- Not done No consensus reached on merging these articles. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 13:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Not done Only comment(s) disagree with merger rationale. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 13:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Not done Consensus is to not merge these articles. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 13:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Merge City and Colour into Dallas Green (musician). >>Join Discussion. On the City and Colour article currently states in the first sentence that the article is about a recording alias belonging to Dallas Green . It also states the only band member in the associated project is Dallas Green himself. The member list after him is separate and designated "other back up". In its current state a merge is entirely appropriate. --Wudumindif (talk) 00:53, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
-
-
- Working Only comment(s) agree with merging. Proposer, @ElSaxo: or other interested editor should perform the merge. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 13:33, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
*:Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa has been notified to help generate additional attention to the above request(s). Thanks, GenQuest "Talk to Me" 14:51, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
*:Wikipedia:WikiProject Egypt has been notified to help generate additional attention to the above request(s). Thanks, GenQuest "Talk to Me" 14:51, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
- Working Only comment(s) favor merger. Proposer, @Metron: /
A German dialect similar to Pennsylvania German is my mother tongue. I also understand Hutterisch, Bernese German, Alsatian dialect and Plautdietsch.
I also speak additional languages. or other interested editor should proceed with merger. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 13:33, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Merge Fantasy literature into Fantasy; Fantasy literature is a pretty small article, and its scope could easily be incorporated into Fantasy with a little expansion work. Both articles tagged and discussion started >>>HERE<<<. Pariah24 (talk) 08:08, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
- Article(s) are tagged and awaiting consensus, albeit on the wrong article talk page. GenQuest "Talk to Me"
:Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Novels/Fantasy task force has been notified to help generate additional attention to the above request(s). Thanks, GenQuest "Talk to Me" 13:04, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
- Not done No clear consensus for this broad of a merger. A case by case request may pass in future. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 13:01, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Articles are tagged and awaiting consensus on proposal.GenQuest "Talk to Me" 14:47, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
-
-
|
|