Talk:Dying While Black

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Books

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.
	It is requested that a picture or pictures be included in this article to improve its quality.

Notability Tagged[edit]

The AfD for this book's author led me to check holdings, which its WorldCat entry shows to be <50 institutions – quite unremarkable for a book that's been in print for 5 years. While I do see that David Eppstein recently added one source, the picture, as it now stands, does not suggest that this book has any particular notability. I could find nothing more substantive, only the web flotsam of web chats, Google book scan, and websites related to the author's presentation of this work. I invite others to add WP:RS evidence of notability and ask that you please do not remove the notability tag until such evidence is posted. Thanks, Agricola44 (talk) 16:26, 12 January 2011 (UTC).[reply]

More than a year and a half later the picture is about the same, for example WorldCat shows only 49 institutions having the book. If notability cannot be demonstrated in the near future, I'm going to put this up at AfD. Thanks, Agricola44 (talk) 13:40, 18 September 2012 (UTC).[reply]

2015 PROD[edit]

This is a dead-end article that could have been cleaned-up uncontroversially by PROD, but was not. More comments here. Agricola44 (talk) 17:40, 28 January 2015 (UTC).[reply]