Talk:The Feels (song)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Feels (song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Lililolol (talk · contribs) 21:33, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 18:59, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

   b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a. (reference section):

   b. (citations to reliable sources):

   c. (OR):

   d. (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a. (major aspects):

   b. (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

   b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

I will do this today now!! --K. Peake 18:59, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

Infobox and lead

• JYPE Studios → JYPE in the infobox per Template:Infobox song
• Mention in the first sentence that it was "recorded for their third Korean studio album, Formula of Love: O+T=＜3 (2021)." with the wikilink
• The lead is quite short, so you could do with writing out the songwriters and producers in the background section and then it can be included here too
• Remove pipe on groovy here per MOS:LINKSTYLE
• Pipe synth to Synthesizer
• "Its lyrics are about the protagonist's" → "The lyrics are about the protagonist's"
• "best-of lists by" → "best-of lists by the likes of"
• The chart position seem poorly laid out; not only should South Korea probably be first since that is where the group are from, but New Zealand is not notable when it is only a Hot Singles chart and why is the Netherlands position not mentioned when lower positions are? Also, change the UK to the United Kingdom
• "went on to get certified Gold by" → "was certified gold by"
• Remove the amount of units or streams each certification represents
• "In Japan, it was certified Platinum by" → "In Japan, it was certified platinum by"

Background

• "Cry for Me" is not mentioned by the source – "What You Waiting For" is though, a song later mentioned in this section too
• "on their first Japanese album," → "on the group's first Japanese album,"
• Delete the 2018 Japanese film since this is not notable
• The 10th EP's release is not sourced
• "On August 23, JYP Entertainment" → "On August 23, 2021, JYP Entertainment"
• Using this, I would add the group's comments about it being their first English single and they also mentioned a desired to communicate to audiences in the United States that is notable

Music and lyrics

• Audio sample looks good!
• ""The Feels" is a" → "Musically, "The Feels" is a"
• There is a drum that should be added in prose; maybe move the part after the genre and tempo of the current opening sentence to a new sentence and include this with that?
• The first comma should be before group member rather than explained
• "saying, "the song is about falling" → "saying, "The song is about falling"
• Add the release years in brackets of "Like Ooh-Ahh" and "Cheer Up"
• I think adding the refrain to this section would be worth it

Critical reception

• Retitle to Reception and merge commercial performance per that being one para
• "received generally positive reviews" → "was met with generally positive reviews"
• Add the release year of Eyes Wide Open
• "that resembles "their early tracks"." → "that resembles the optimism of their earlier work."
• Remove wikilink on NME at the list since they are linked at the start of this section
• Mention the name of the NME and Rolling Stone reviewers who made these comments
• Remove pipe on chorus
• The year-end lists sentence is not needed when you already added enough in prose and the rest are displayed beneath

Commercial performance

• This should be a sub-section, below the rankings
• The information feels disordered; I would move South Korea to first per it being their home country and the global streams and Global 200 to last since this is more of a finalization, as it is worldwide
• You should mention along with the United States stats the position it entered the Billboard Hot 100 at
• "peaked at number 3" → "peaked at number three" per MOS:NUM and Japan should be the second country since it is the closest to South Korea and then have the New Zealand, Malaysia, and Singapore positions
• Add the Japanese certification in prose
• "the group's second entry" → "becoming Twice's second entry"
• You need a source for it being their first song to chart on the UK Singles Chart
• "landed at no. 40" → "landed at number 40"
• "received a Gold certification" → "received a gold certification" and mention this was in the US with the number of certified units signified

Release and promotion

• Move this to being the section before reception
• Pre-orders are not showing as sourced, unless that is my Google translator's issue; if not sourced, please simply change to one sentence that mentions the release date they announced on September 3 too
• If the single release date is not added in the above sentence, mention it in one afterwards please
• "with a performance of" → "with performances of" although the Stephen Colbert one is not sourced and add that these performances were during 2021
• Chaeyoung should not be wikilinked and the member writing these lyrics is unsourced

Music video

Background

• Wikilink music video, although the director is not mentioned by the source
• "on JYP Entertainment's official social media channels" → "on JYP Entertainment's official YouTube channel" per the source's video
• "of the 1995 movie" → "of the 1995 film"
• The last sentence reads repetitively; reword it to either stating they announced or teased their third Korean album and third tour at the end of the video

Synopsis and reception

• Img looks good!
• Remove overly obvious wikilink on prom
• ""deluxe wardrobe that the girls are hanging out in."" → ""deluxe wardrobe" that Twice appear in."
• "Then it shows the members" → "Then, the video shows the members"
• "on their evening."" → "on their evening"." per MOS:QUOTE
• "The Twice members take a break..." the quote should end here and put this new sentence into your own words, per MOS:OVERQUOTE
• Mention the poster ending scene that teases their next album and tour
• Wikilink Rolling Stone India to itself per MOS:LINK2SECT
• "included it in their list" → "included the music video in their list"
• The visual losing to "Lalisa" is not sourced; either source this or only keep the mention of the nomination if not

Track listing

• Good

Credits and personnel

• Use Sub-headings instead of sub-sections
• Use {{spaced ndash}} so there is the right space between credits and personnel
• Engineer should only be linked on the first instance and keep as audio engineer link

Charts

Weekly charts

• The Netherlands chart position is not sourced

Year-end charts

• Good

Certifications

• Good

Notes

• Good

References

• Copyvio score looks too high at 42.4%; this should be fixed once you chop down quoting from Billboard in the music video section
• Wikilink NME on ref 1
• Cite KBS Media as publisher instead, wikilink Naver here instead of any later refs and fix MOS:QWQ issues with ref 3
• Wikilink iTunes as publisher and fix MOS:CAPS issues with ref 4 that only apply to the song's title here
• Cite iTunes as publisher on refs 5, 6, 59 and 61
• Wikilink South China Morning Post on ref 7
• Pipe Herald Pop to Herald Corporation on ref 8
• Pipe Sports Dong-A to The Dong-a Ilbo on ref 10
• Pipe Billboard to Billboard (magazine) on ref 11
• Pipe SPOTV News to SPOTV on ref 12
• Fix MOS:CAPS issues with ref 15
• Pipe Bustle to Bustle (magazine) and fix MOS:QWQ issues on ref 17
• WP:OVERLINK of Korea JoongAng Daily]] on ref 18
• Fix MOS:QWQ issues with refs 20, 47 and 55
• Wikilink The Harvard Crimson on ref 21
• Cite Mashable as publisher instead with the wikilink on ref 22
• Wikilink Rolling Stone on ref 24
• Pipe Insider to Insider (website) per MOS:LINK2SECT on ref 25
• Pipe Pitchfork to Pitchfork (website) on ref 26
• I am not sure about the reliability of ref 27; can you point to any editorial team or evidence of general reliability?
• Cite Gaon Music Chart as publisher instead on ref 35
• Remove or replace Forbes from ref 37 per WP:FORBES
• WP:OVERLINK of The Korea Herald on ref 37
• Cite Recording Industry Association of Malaysia as publisher instead with the wikilink on ref 41
• Wikilink Recording Industry Association Singapore on ref 42
• Wikilink Twitter and cite as via instead on ref 46
• Cite Apple Music as publisher instead with the wikilink on ref 49
• Fix MOS:QWQ issues and cite YouTube as publisher instead on ref 50
• Fix MOS:QWQ issues, date formatting and wikilink Elite Daily on ref 51
• Pipe People to People (magazine) on ref 54
• Wikilink Rolling Stone India on ref 57
• Cite Spotify as publisher instead with the wikilink on ref 60
• Cite Melon as publisher instead on ref 62

Final comments and verdict

•  On hold until all of the issues are fixed; this should not take too long, apologies for my delay! --K. Peake 21:19, 27 May 2024 (UTC)