Talk:Vibecession

Article is Unbalanced

This article has several issues:

1. For one, vibecession seems unlikely to comprise a meaningful part of historical analyses of this moment a decade from now. This analysis smacks of recency bias and only provides one example: that of the current moment.
2. For two the article is unbalanced and neglects other analyses from different POV (See here) that might argue that for example the perspective that the economy is weak is a reflection of a section of the population that is *actually* not doing well while other sectors are doing great.

Remusofreem (talk) 19:23, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

agree. this should be deleted. The author page even redirects here. No relevance at all. This should be no more than a note (with opposing views) in a larger article about the political issue it is contextualized. Gcbwiki (talk) 16:29, 9 June 2024 (UTC)