This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
A fact from Aboriginal title in the United States appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 August 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
I'm not sure how I feel about the illustrations next to "Extinguishment." I understand it relates to the topic at hand in an engaging manner, I'm just wondering if anyone finds the "-by purchase... or by conquest" captions to be a little melodramatic for an otherwise very dry legal article. I'm honestly not sure myself whether I like it or not, I'm just putting the question out there. 17:06, 21 February 2011 (UTC) The Cap'n (talk) 22:30, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have nothing non-snarky to say in response to this. Savidan 22:53, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]