Talk:Heiligenstadt Testament

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles

Some external links[edit]

You can find some info here: http://www.carolinaclassical.com/articles/beethoven.html Original (in German): http://w3.rz-berlin.mpg.de/cmp/beethoven_heiligenstadt.html More info (and manuscripts), here: http://www.beethoven-haus-bonn.de

Will?[edit]

I don't believe that this document is a will within the meaning of the Act. Its principal purpose isn't to say who should receive Beethoven's possessions after his death, which is the principal purpose of a will - this document is a combination of an apology and a cri de coeur It looks to me as if someone (maybe someone for whom English isn't a first language?) has assumed that "testament" equals "will", which it doesn't really in this case. German Wikipedia says "Das Heiligenstädter Testament ist ein Brief", and I propose that the word "will" be changed to "letter". I'll do it myself if there's no disagreement here. --GuillaumeTell 17:03, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This document is a will, it fulfills all legal demands of such a document which were valid at that time and it would have been accepted as a will by the civil court of the Vienna City Council.--91.115.49.167 (talk) 14:18, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Translation[edit]

I don't like it. The use of 3-400 year old English, I feel, detracts from the emotional appeal of it. Beethoven was in the deepest despair when he wrote this - a composer going deaf. I propose modifying the translation into more common speech to help convey the emotion. I'm not saying paraphrasing, just change 'ye' to 'you' and whatnot. --Milton 17:05, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]