Talk:Long-focus lens
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
An objective is an objective- astrophotography is optically no different from a safari, or a lab setup. However, telephoto is telephoto... but photo-oriented refractors may feature reducers, not extenders. The rest of your objections are valid but correctable- thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by NoodleWhacks (talk • contribs)
- I removed your section on telescopes again (the first time it was someone else who removed it). It was a rambling essay, unsourced, badly written and badly punctuated, sort of a how-to based on your experience. If you have some sources that we can base it on, I can help you make something more encyclopedic about telescopes being long-focus lenses. Dicklyon (talk) 05:56, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
- System cameras can use both telescopes and microscopes readily via T- and C-mount, for any purpose- the system does not know or care what you're pointing at. Ask a hardcore birder. If that sounds like howto, then the issue is my style and diction, not the subject at hand.
- NoodleWhacks 18:04, July 3 2011 —Preceding undated comment added 22:05, 3 July 2011 (UTC).
- ...and I have been a professional writer and semi-pro copy editor, so it's not apparent to me what the issue is with punctuation. Nevertheless, I have chosen to streamlined the text. NoodleWhacks 18:04, July 3 2011 —Preceding undated comment added 00:34, 4 July 2011 (UTC).
- See WP:REFPUNCT and WP:DASH for starters. Also, we use sentence case for WP:headings. Dicklyon (talk) 00:56, 4 July 2011 (UTC)