Talk:Maximally stable extremal regions

unintelligible formula[edit]

Hi, In this article, I have an objection to using the formula $q(i)=|Q_{i+\Delta }\setminus Q_{i-\Delta }|/|Q_{i}|$ .
I know it's in the paper by Matas but as all Q are sets, I have no idea what the operator / is supposed to mean. If this is not simply due to my lack of mathematical understanding, it would be good to clarify what is meant by this expression. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.246.7.32 (talk) 11:34, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't agree that the division symbol needs explaining. However, perhaps you have misunderstood what is here. The pipes |.|, which denote cardinality, turn the sets into normal real numbers. Thus, the division sign is then just a normal division. If anything, perhaps the |.| needs to be explained. Blackshadowshade (talk) 16:01, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps <math>q(i) = \frac{| Q_{i+\Delta} \setminus Q_{i-\Delta} |}{|Q_i|}</math> would be clearer?

$q(i)={\frac {|Q_{i+\Delta }\setminus Q_{i-\Delta }|}{|Q_{i}|}}$

50.80.100.93 (talk) 04:58, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

dead link[edit]

Just noticed that reference #3 returns a "Forbidden" error, is there another source available? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.110.4.86 (talk) 03:17, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Misleading definition of totally ordered set[edit]

According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_order , totally ordered set is a set X that has relation, that is antisymmetric, transitive and total. With the given definition without totality (antisymmetric, transitive, reflexive), there can be pairs of different elements from X that are not related to each other. Totality implies reflexivity.

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Maximally stable extremal regions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:56, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

$i + Δ$ [edit]

In the text, $i$ is described as an integer. On the other hand, $Δ \in S$ where $S$ is described as totally ordered, but doesn't necessarily support a concept of addition. So, what is $Q i + Δ$ meant to be? 66.194.253.20 (talk) 20:52, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

unintelligible formula[edit]

dead link[edit]

Misleading definition of totally ordered set[edit]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

i + Δ[edit]

$i + Δ$ [edit]