Talk:Onsen Nozokimi Daisakusen

Onsen Nozokimi Daisakusen has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: May 10, 2024. (Reviewed version).

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Pit (Kid Icarus) (8 participants)
Dancing Stage Max (3 participants)
Bez-MX (9 participants)
Ghosts (Pac-Man) (14 participants)
Midnight.works (5 participants)
Revenge of the Killer Robots from Hell (3 participants)
Vette (Star Wars) (5 participants; relisted)
International Hobo (2 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Onsen Nozokimi Daisakusen/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Alexandra IDV (talk · contribs) 20:43, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Pokelego999 (talk · contribs) 22:00, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take this one on as soon as I can. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 22:00, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Alexandra IDV (talk · contribs)

Six GA Criteria[edit]

1. Article is well-written.

2. No OR, all info is cited in the article.

3. Coverage is broad in depth and focus. Shows multiple aspects of the game.

4. Article appears neutral, and does not appear to hold a significantly negative nor positive stance on the subject.

5. Article appears stable. Does not appear to have had any major vandalism occur.

6. Article uses two fair use images with proper rationale.

Lead[edit]

-Looks good

Gameplay[edit]

-Looks good

Development and Release[edit]

-Looks good

Reception[edit]

-"as loved by the masses," I'd reword this a bit.

Fair, it's both a bit much and overlaps the stuff about its popularity.--Alexandra^IDV 06:13, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

-I feel the "since the original Revelations: Persona," can be cut.

Changed to found the game shocking as a long-time fan of Persona--Alexandra^IDV 06:13, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

-"In the end, Ikeya still found the game fun and exciting, and enjoyed the ending." I'd reword since this seems to be a separate review from the sentence it's connected to just prior.

You're right, there are two separate NLab sources by different writers. I've moved this bit up so it comes right after the earlier Ikeya bit.--Alexandra^IDV 06:13, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Overall[edit]

This is the most bizarre thing, and I was not expecting this when taking on this review. In any case, article itself mostly looks fine, just patch the above and this should be good to go. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 22:50, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Pokelego999: Thank you for the review! Yeah, it's wild that this kind of thing even exists, but I guess 2008 was a different time. I've done my best to adress the issues you brought up in this edit - let me know how you feel about it, and if there's any further changes you'd like to see.--Alexandra^IDV 06:13, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good. Happy to pass. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 20:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]