Talk:Progress 2

Wow[edit]

Nice work! The "feel" of the article is really good. Are you just being modest with the 'B' rating? The article seems the appropriate length and provides good detail with excellent referencing. Is there much room for improvement? (sdsds - talk) 08:09, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the minimum standard I'm aiming for with all of the Progress articles. I can't really get it beyond B class without a GAN, and I couldn't be bothered to nominate it, but if you think it is worthwhile then go for it. --G W… 12:22, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Progress 2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:45, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]