Talk:Reference Re Ng Extradition

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Doesn't add up?[edit]

How come there's 3 majority and 3 dissent but the majority still wins? WP 11:58, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reference[edit]

The article says that its topic "is a Supreme Court of Canada reference...." What is a "reference"? The word seems to be used in some technical legal sense (perhaps specific to Canadian law?) that is not clear to me, and probably not clear to many others as well. --Trovatore 20:53, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See reference question -PullUpYourSocks 00:55, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In reality, Charles Ng was to be released into the public in Canada, as he was finishing up his sentence for the shooting of a security guard. California called Canada's bluff on extradition, citing they would be releasing a known serial killer to the Canadian public. When this was tabled, the Canadian Justice system used whatever they could find to have Ng sent back to the US.209.89.243.123 (talk) 01:10, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Plausible, and interesting if true. Do you have a cite? (As an aside, I'm against capital punishment, but I could hardly blame the Canadians for not wanting this individual wandering around free in their country.) --Trovatore (talk) 04:58, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Citation[edit]

[1991] 2 SCR 858, 1991 CanLII 79 --Bancki (talk) 10:21, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ng escaped custody in California? Or not?[edit]

This article says Ng had escaped custody in California and had fled to Canada; according to the article on Charles Ng he was not arrested after the discovery of the murders because he was nowhere to be found. Who knows which is correct? Moletrouser (talk) 08:16, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Reference Re Ng Extradition. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:55, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]