Talk:Second Battle of Collierville

Military history: North America / United States / American Civil War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	American Civil War task force

Tennessee Low‑importance

	Tennessee portal Second Battle of Collierville is within the scope of WikiProject Tennessee, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of Tennessee and related subjects in the Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, and even become a member. [Project Articles] • [Project Page] • [Project Talk] • [Assessment] • [Template Usage]TennesseeWikipedia:WikiProject TennesseeTemplate:WikiProject TennesseeTennessee articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Proposed merge of Battle of Collierville with Second Battle of Collierville[edit]

Unneeded CFORK // Timothy :: talk 08:39, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: a content fork is when two or more articles cover the same subject. In this case, we have several battles and skirmishes over the course of several weeks. The first article and second article do not seem to overlap time periods and appear to be separate engagements with different units and commanders involved. This isn't a fork so no merge is required. BusterD (talk) 11:01, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]