Talk:So Yesterday (novel)

This article was nominated for deletion on 2 March 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks you can do:

Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks.

Add {{Portal|Children's literature}} to the See also section of related articles.
Tag the talk pages of related articles with {{WikiProject Children's literature}}
Join WikiProject Children's literature and list yourself as a Participant in the project.
Cleanup: A cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.
Deletion discussions: listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Literature
Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability
Rate the Unassessed articles in the Children's literature WikiProject.
References: Add references to Unreferenced BLPs.
Requested articles: Create a requested article on literature
Stubs: Improve a stub-class article

edit

Novels Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pokemon[edit]

The part about the pokemon episode that "caused seizures in over 600" children is untrue. Nowhere near that many children experienced seizures from that incident. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.194.10.13 (talk) 18:30, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quoted from the "Denno Senshi Porygon" page-"Japan's Fire Defense Agency reported that a total of 685 viewers, 310 boys and 375 girls, were taken to hospitals by ambulances." -Minako-chan27 (talk) 03:32, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bwaaaa!![edit]

This article makes no sense. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.74.210.5 (talk) 20:33, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I found it absolute rubbish, too. I wish it were more coherent. If it weren't so incoherent and messed-up, I might want to read the book more. Lu na ke et 17:20, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That’s was nice of you to say that but I don’t think you should be able to do that because you have to be there for your own family 2600:1004:B01A:5DC6:3969:73F5:4706:D2F9 (talk) 14:35, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

its all good[edit]

It's a good book i randomley checked it out of my libary and liked it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.118.200.113 (talk) 23:59, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fahrenheit 9/11 or 451?[edit]

"...and has been optioned to be made into a film by one of the producers of Fahrenheit 451 and Bowling for Columbine"

^ This line has to be referring to Fahrenheit 9/11, and not a film version of the Ray Bradbury novel, right? I tried looking through the cited source: [citation 6] and found nothing specific about by whom a film version is being produced or optioned to be produced, so I didn't change the line right-out.