User talk:Isthmus55

A belated welcome![edit]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Isthmus55! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Skarmory (talk • contribs) 18:32, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Isthmus55 (talk) 20:13, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Black Lake (song)[edit]

Thanks for expanding this article! I've made a few recent edits but feel free to revert if you disagree with any or all. If you have Good article status as a goal (I hope you do), good luck! Either way , happy editing ---Another Believer _(Talk) 22:34, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! The only edit I made some changes to was the one for the headers in the music video's section, given I'm going to expand it with more content in the coming week and make it a bit more organized regardless. Following that, expanding the lede, and adding a section for its release and promotion, I hope to be able to nominate it for GA status by the end of July (at the very least). Thanks for your edits to it! Isthmus55 (t • c) 23:12, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Like ---Another Believer _(Talk) 23:56, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Help[edit]

Hi,

I have been blocked from the Ariana Grande article for an indefinite time. I send a unblock request and still have not get a feedback. Can you please fix two things on the Ariana Grande page for me. I would really appreciate it as I know you don't have to do this

1. Can you re-add “Songwriter” on the lead on the first paragraph? Some editor has removed it without explanation, even if there have been multiple discussions about to keep it there.

2. Sources to Grande's 98 billion streams, which are from reliable outlets like Variety and Deadline, were removed. Can you re-added the info in her achievement section, as it's in the lead, and one of Grande's biggest accomplishments. Sources: 1.https://variety.com/2021/digital/news/hybe-merges-ithaca-holdings-scooter-braun-bts-1234943092/ 2.https://deadline.com/2021/11/ariana-grande-cynthia-erivo-to-star-in-universals-musical-wicked-1234868595/

Thank you. Mirrored7 (talk) 16:40, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Both of your ideas are plausible.

1. Though I personally support adding "songwriter" to the first paragraph, it doesn't seem like an ubiquitous decision. I would suggest bringing the topic up to another user, as I'm not the most involved in her article apart from the image RFC.

2. The first source says she "recently surpassed 90 billion streams," though the second source seems fine. It's kind of an ever-changing number, so maybe only change it every time she reaches another 5 billion (the next time would be 100 billion, presumably, but both sources are from 2021).

So yeah, it's probably better to discuss with someone else. Best of luck on the unblock request, though be aware of Aoi's comment here. Isthmus55 (t • c) 17:41, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing your latest comment on that talk page, I'd advise you to maybe not assume bad faith, as it will hinder your chances of getting unblocked. No matter how much you may disagree with another's edits, you should strive for compromise first and criticism second. Isthmus55 (t • c) 17:49, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]